Judge Reinstates Ezekiel Elliott's 6-game Suspension

NEW YORK -- A federal judge cleared the way Monday night for the NFL to enforce a six-game suspension of Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott over domestic violence allegations.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla denied the request for a preliminary injunction from players' union attorneys working for Elliott. Failla put the ruling on hold for 24 hours to give Elliott's legal team time to appeal, a likely move.

It's the second time a federal ruling has overturned a reprieve that kept Elliott on the field. Earlier this month, a federal appeals court threw out a Texas court's injunction and ordered the dismissal of Elliott's lawsuit there.

The NFL briefly enforced Commissioner Roger Goodell's suspension before a judge sitting in for Failla in the Southern District of New York issued a temporary restraining order that blocked the punishment for the second time.

If the suspension holds this time, Elliott will be out starting Sunday at home against Kansas City. He will be eligible to return Dec. 17 at Oakland.

Elliott attended the roughly two-hour hearing in New York on Monday, a day after rushing for 150 yards and two touchdowns in the Cowboys' 33-19 win at Washington. He left court without speaking to reporters.

The 22-year-old Elliott was suspended in August after the league concluded following a yearlong investigation that he had several physical confrontations in the summer of 2016 with Tiffany Thompson, his girlfriend at the time.

Philadelphia Eagles

Complete coverage of the Philadelphia Eagles and their NFL rivals from NBC Sports Philadelphia.

Jason Kelce lost his Super Bowl ring in the strangest way possible

Did the Eagles drop a hint about their plan for next week's draft?

Prosecutors in Columbus, Ohio, decided not to pursue the case in the city where Elliott starred for Ohio State, citing conflicting evidence. Elliott denied the allegations under oath during his NFL appeal.

A lawyer for the NFL Players Association, Jeffrey Kessler, argued that the process Goodell used to determine the punishment against Elliott was "fundamentally unfair" because it downplayed the conclusion by an internal investigator that Thompson wasn't credible in her account of the 2016 violence.

The doubts "were kept from the union, the Cowboys, the player and, we believe, Mr. Goodell," Kessler said.

At one point, the judge asked NFL attorney Paul Clement, "Why it was OK that the commissioner was not told that (the investigator) had concerns?"

Clement responded that a report given to Goodell before he made his decision made clear that the accuser was a flawed witness, but that he relied on photos of her bruised body and other corroborating evidence to make his decision. Though criminal authorities declined to bring charges in the case, the league has an obligation to combat domestic abuse under its labor agreement, he said.

"There's a concern on the behalf of the league that its players are held to a higher standard," Clement said.

The union's suggestion that its lawyer should have been able to cross-examine Thompson during an arbitration hearing won by the league would set a "terrible precedent," he added.

Copyright CSNPhily
Contact Us