WASHINGTON -- They live in the shadow of the Capitol dome, but District of Columbia residents have never had what Americans in all 50 states do: A voting member of Congress.
Resentment over their long exclusion could soon fade as Congress moves closer to giving D.C. its first full seat in the House of Representatives. The bill, which a sympathetic President Barack Obama has said he will sign into law, puts the city of 600,000 on the cusp of historic change -- if it survives a court challenge.
D.C. residents have been fighting for voting rights since 1801, when Congress took control of the newly created capital. It wasn't until 1964 that residents were able to cast presidential ballots, and it took almost another decade for Congress to pass the Home Rule Act, allowing for the direct election of the mayor and other city officials.
U.S. & World
Stories that affect your life across the U.S. and around the world.
Yet a full vote on Capitol Hill has been elusive. Although the District has elected a representative since the 1970s, that House delegate can only vote in committees.
Hopes for a true spot in the people's chamber soared this week when the Senate agreed to take up the bill that would expand the 435-member House by two seats.
The bill, nearly identical to one senators killed two years ago, would give the District a vote in the House beginning in January 2011. To offset the likely election of a Democrat, the bill also adds a fourth seat for Republican-leaning Utah, which narrowly missed out on an extra spot after the 2000 census.
It helps that D.C. has an ally in President Obama, who has expressed an eagerness to be a part of the city and has been quick to visit popular neighborhood hangouts such as Ben's Chili Bowl. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty also was among the first to endorse Obama for president after he came out in support of voting rights.
The Senate could pass the bill within days if supporters can fend off hostile amendments designed to peel away support. In the House, which approved the bill two years ago, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said he expects a floor vote next week.
"We see all lights on go," said a beaming Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, the city's nonvoting member of Congress, who will have the right to vote if she wins re-election in 2010. "There can't be no turning back now."
The momentum for full voting rights has been building for years. In 2000, the city sought to educate the nation about its plight by introducing license plates that proclaimed "Taxation Without Representation."
Even with growing support, some senators and scholars have pointed out that Washington is a city and the U.S. Constitution says the House should consist of members chosen "by the people of the several states."
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley sympathizes with the plight of D.C. residents, but insists the measure is "flagrantly unconstitutional" and ultimately doomed.
"What these (lawmakers) are doing is extremely dangerous and destabilizing for our system of government," Turley said. "They are claiming the right to create a new type of voting member."
The bill opens the door for Congress to give the vote to Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories, he said.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., a co-sponsor of the bill, counters that the District is often treated as a state when it comes to taxation and interstate commerce.
The city has a complicated and often contentious relationship with Congress, which approves its budget.
During a particularly low point for the cash-strapped city in the 1990s, lawmakers stripped then-Mayor Marion Barry and the council of essentially all control over top agencies and appointed a financial control board. "Democracy has been raped," Barry declared then.
For much of the past decade, however, district leaders have worked hard to improve D.C.'s relationship with Congress while also leading the city back to fiscal health, including 12 years of balanced budgets.