Judge Rules Against Trump in Case Over Immigration Program - NBC 10 Philadelphia
Immigration in America

Immigration in America

Full coverage of immigration issues in the U.S.

Judge Rules Against Trump in Case Over Immigration Program

The judge says Trump's administration relied on an "erroneous" belief the program was unconstitutional

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    Judge Rules Against Trump in Case Over Immigration Program
    Getty Images
    In this Sept, 10, 2017, file photo, Immigrants and supporters gather across the street from the Trump International Hotel & Tower Las Vegas for a "We Rise for the Dream" rally to oppose U.S. President Donald Trump's order to end DACA. The Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program protects young immigrants who grew up in the U.S. after arriving with their undocumented parents from deportation to a foreign country. Trump's executive order removes protection for about 800,000 current "dreamers," about 13,000 of whom live in Nevada. Congress has the option to replace the policy with legislation before DACA expires on March 5, 2018.

    President Donald Trump's administration didn't offer "legally adequate reasons" for ending a program that spared many young immigrants from deportation if they were brought to the U.S. as children, a judge ruled Tuesday as he ordered the program to continue.

    U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis in Brooklyn said in a written order that the Republican president "indisputably" has the power to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program but relied on flawed legal positions in doing so.

    "The Trump administration should be able to alter the policies and priorities set by its predecessor," Garaufis said.

    He said his order does not require the government to grant any particular DACA applications or renewal requests.

    President Trump Outlines Pillars of Immigration Reform

    [NATL] President Trump Outlines Pillars of Immigration Reform

    President Trump drew both cheers and boos during the State of the Union as he outlined his administration's key pillars for immigration reform.

    (Published Tuesday, Jan. 30, 2018)

    The ruling came in lawsuits brought by immigration rights groups and 15 states and the District of Columbia.

    Justice Department spokesman Devin O'Malley said the order doesn't change the government's position that DACA was an "unlawful circumvention of Congress."

    "DACA was implemented unilaterally after Congress declined to extend these benefits to this same group of illegal aliens," he said.

    O'Malley added that the Department of Homeland Security "acted within its lawful authority in deciding to wind down DACA in an orderly manner" and looked forward to vindicating its position in future litigation.

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions has said then-President Barack Obama's decision to implement DACA was an unconstitutional exercise of authority. Known as "dreamers," participants in the program were brought to the U.S. illegally as children or came with families who overstayed visas.

    "Today's ruling gives hope to me and dreamers around the country," said Eliana Fernandez, a plaintiff in the case. "We are thrilled with this preliminary injunction."

    'Late Night’: A Closer Look at Giuliani, Miller Defending Trump

    [NATL] 'Late Night’: A Closer Look at Giuliani, Miller Defending Trump

    Seth Meyers takes a closer look at how President Donald Trump's friends and aides have abandoned him, leaving only Stephen Miller and Rudy Giuliani to defend him.

    (Published Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2018)

    Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, said the ruling shows that how Trump ended DACA "was not just immoral, it was unlawful."

    Garaufis said the Trump administration relied on an "erroneous" belief the program was unconstitutional. His ruling mirrors one issued in San Francisco in January.

    "DACA is not unconstitutional simply because it was implemented by unilateral, executive action without express congressional authorization," Garaufis said. He said Congress has acknowledged the executive branch's power to decline to remove some vulnerable immigrants otherwise subject to deportation from the country.

    The judge ordered the government to let people already in the DACA program continue enjoying protections but declined to guarantee the program to new applicants.

    Garaufis said the authority for his ruling stems from the Administrative Procedure Act, which lets parties harmed by federal agencies get judicial review of agency decisions when they are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or do not follow the law.

    He said the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on their claim that the DACA rescission was arbitrary and capricious.

    Reports Show Russian Social Media Influence in 2016

    [NATL] Reports Show Russian Support of Trump in 2016 Election

    Two new reports commissioned by the Senate Intelligence Committee lay out the stunning steps taken by Russians to influence the 2016 election.

    (Published Monday, Dec. 17, 2018)

    Garaufis said the decision to end the program appeared to rest exclusively on a legal conclusion that the program was unconstitutional and violated the APA and the Immigration and Nationality Act.

    "Because that conclusion was erroneous, the decision to end the DACA program cannot stand," he said.

    Associated Press Writer Deepti Hajela contributed to this report.